-Fixed Fees | No Hidden Charges-

Further representations may be made where you have had an initial asylum and/or human rights claim refused, or have withdrawn such a claim, and have exhausted all appeal rights in relation to that claim. If you have new or additional information which has come to light following the final decision on your previous claim, it is possible to make representations based on the new information to the Home Office and ask them to treat these fresh representations as a fresh claim for asylum.  The Home Office will then consider the fresh representations in accordance with Paragraph 353 of the Immigration Rules.

Further & Fresh Claims Under the Immigration Act

Paragraph 353 states:

“When a human rights or asylum claim has been refused or withdrawn or treated as withdrawn under paragraph 333C of these Rules and any appeal relating to that claim is no longer pending, the decision maker will consider any further submissions and, if rejected, will then determine whether they amount to a fresh claim. The submissions will amount to a fresh claim if they are significantly different from the material that has previously been considered.

The submissions will only be significantly different if the content:
(i)   has not already been considered; and
(ii) taken together with the previously considered material, created a realistic prospect of success, notwithstanding its rejection.

This paragraph does not apply to claims made overseas.”

The Home Office will apply a two-stage process for applying paragraph 353.

Considering whether leave should be granted

In all cases where further submissions are received, the first stage for the Home Office is to decide whether or not to grant you leave to remain. The Home Office case owner will consider all available evidence when deciding whether you qualify for leave. This will include all information you put forward but also information such as new country information or a new policy. The Home Office case owner will also act upon the findings of the final appeal determination.

The Home Office may be uncertain whether to grant you leave to remain on the basis of the information provided and so may decide to invite you to attend an interview.

Deciding whether further submissions constitute a fresh claim for asylum

If the Home Office case owner decides that it would not be appropriate to grant you leave to remain, the second stage is to determine whether the further representations constitute a fresh claim for asylum.

Paragraph 353 states that representations will amount to a fresh claim if they are “significantly different” from the material that has already been considered.

Representations will only be significantly different if the content:
• has not already been considered; and
• taken together with the previously considered material, creates a realistic prospect of success.

Has the material already been considered?

If the material you now wish to put forward has already been considered by the Home Office or at appeal, it will have been considered already for the purposes of paragraph 353 and there will be no fresh claim. If the material has previously been considered, the Home Office will not need to consider whether the material creates a realistic prospect of success and the application will simply be rejected.

Does the material create a realistic prospect of success?

If the material you put forward in the further submissions has not previously been considered, the Home Office will decide whether the new information, taken together with the material previously considered, raises a realistic prospect of success. The test of a “realistic prospect of success” is a low one. This is because the Home Office are bound to follow the guidance laid down in cases that have come before the United Kingdom courts which have stated:

  1. that the question is, whether there is a realistic prospect of success in an application before an immigration judge, but not more than that;
  2. the immigration judge himself does not have to be certain about the information, only that it indicates that there is a real risk of you being persecuted on return; and
  3. since the issue in questions is asylum, all decision-makers in the case including the Secretary of State, the immigration judge and the court, must give the material the most anxious scrutiny.

This essentially means that an applicant who raises asylum issues in further submissions will have a fresh claim if there is a realistic prospect of an Immigration Judge deciding that he should be granted leave on humanitarian protection grounds.

Contact Sultan Lloyd

If you need help with Immigration Law, call us on: +44 (0)121 248 2850, by mobile on: +44 (0)7961 314 247 or email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Alternatively, click here to make an online enquiry.

We are open from 9am till 5.30pm, Monday to Friday. If you work full time and can’t see us during the week, we offer pre-arranged Saturday appointments for your convenience.

 

Online Enquiry

Your Name(*)
Please let us know your name.

Your Email(*)
Please let us know your email address.

Telephone(*)
Invalid telephone number

Occupation Type(*)
Please choose your type of occupation from the list.

Occupation Type

Enquiry(*)
Please let us know your message.

Invalid Input

Read our latest blogs

Love conquers all; except the UK visa system. Every year, many couples endure forced separation because one party cannot obtain a UK Spouse visa. During her time in as Home Secretary, Theresa May to...
When a couple divorce, emotions can run rampant. Even if both parties vow to be as ‘amicable as possible’ and ‘get on for the sake of the children’, anger, frustration and bitterness can spill over. ...
EU citizens residing in the UK are worried. They are right to be so. The referendum result is an emotional upheaval. But politics is one thing and law another. At Sultan Lloyd we understand the fe...

Our Success Stories

In the course of delivering excellent service to best serve the individual cases, we have emerged successful in a number of cases.

Here is the list

Testimonials

'My friends, the Patel family, were referred to Harminder Meht of Sultan Lloyd in September 2013.  We met Harminder when circumstances were very challenging and Harminder explained the available options very clearly, helpfully and with evident empathy and understanding.  Thereafter she and her colleagues helped us at every step including securing legal aid despite the fact that a previous solicitor had not identified that this was possible. Harminder was instrumental in securing the release from detention of one member of the family and following a difficult judicial review process she obtained a Home Office decision that allows the family leave to remain in the UK, to work and study here for the next 30 months. We are all delighted with Harminder and Sultan Lloyd and we are very happy to recommend Harminder and Sultan Lloyd to future users of their services.'

-- Alasdair Denton

'With a track record of involvement in all kinds of business and private applications, Country Guidance cases, judicial reviews and appeals to the Court of Appeal, Sultan Lloyd have expertise both in publicly funded work and commercial immigration, making them one of the outstanding immigration specialists in the Midlands.'

-- Mark Symes, Counsel at Garden Court Chambers, London

'I have been instructed by Messrs SL for a number of years and in various asylum and immigration matters. The firm has always provided a friendly and professional service and is dedicated to achieving the most favourable outcome for their clients. The staff is both efficient and courteous and offers a valuable service to vulnerable clients. I would rate the firm as amongst the very best in this area of law, proven by their many reported cases. I would wholeheartedly recommend this firm to anyone seeking representation in an asylum or immigration case.'
-- Issac Maka, Counsel, London


'As one of SL's ex clients, I can say that they worked very accurately and hard on my case. They also used very good quality interpreters.'
-- Ismail Mohammed Nazhad, Ex asylum client, Birmingham

'SL is a very trustworthy and reliable firm, helping those people seeking asylum. I hope they continue working in this way.'

-- Kurdo Rezaie, Ex asylum client, Birmingham

'. . . a reliable, efficient firm. They explained things very clearly and did exactly what they said they would. I was really impressed with their friendly and efficient service.'-- Miss N Osman, Birmingham